*Ways To Get Involved.*

​

*Moor Ways To Get Involved.*

​

​

Become a witness / voice for the cause. Utilize this information to create your own content that helps the Moors reach the People where their voices are being silenced and the prejudice of the Mass media may ultimately determine the futures of eleven innocent Men and their families if the People don't set the record straight.

​

As it currently stands, scheduled trials are to be judged by a jury tainted by biased Media reports on  the matter who are likely unfamiliar with Treaty and/or Constitutional Law. Also, the jury is most certainly not made up of many (if any) Moorish peers, leaving these Moors at the mercy of Massachusetts Media influence and ignorance of Moorish history, constitutional and the natural Law.

​

For those wanting to better familiarize themselves with Moorish American history as it relates to this case, click here.  For those interested in keeping updated on any opportunity to participate whether it is as a jury member or participant in Zoom conference hearings are the calendar of trial dates and a subscription form above.  

​

​

*What You Need to Know as a Moorish Peer, American, and/or Potential Juror*

​

As the Moors' continue to challenge unlawful captivity due to the state's WANT of jurisdiction, something called the "Federal Question" tests the constitutional ingredients of (1) Status (2) Jurisdiction (3) Venue (4) Adjudication to confirm that this matter does NOT belong in state courts. Moorish Viziers have analyzed the ingredients as follows:

​

​

​

Status.

​

The present Union States Municipal and Civil Laws and Codes of the Land are an “incorporated unit of self-government” established by the political powers of the “General Assembly” of each State of the Union and initiated at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, North America in the year Eighteen fifty - four (1854). It governs ONLY the rights and conduct of “WHITE PEOPLE”, Christians and Jews of the Eighteen sixty - three (1863) Union States Rights Republic, under the Magna Charta (Charter), the Knights of Columbus Code, Christian Black Codes, and the Ku Klux Klan Oath. Forever, said Union States Rights Republic denies citizenship in the united states Republic (United States of America) to the descendants of Moorish Americans in the Western Hemisphere who are erroneously referred to, branded, and mislabeled as “Negroes”, “Blacks”, “Coloreds”, “African Americans”, and so forth. In addition, the Supreme Court of the United States in the landmark case of Dred Scott v. Sandford 60 US (19 Howard) 393 (1857) held that “Negroes” - whether held to slavery or free, were not included and were not intended to be included in the “category” of “citizen” (subjects) of the Union States Rights Republic. Finally, the landmark Sundry Free Moors Act of 1790 A.D. enforces the Constitution for the United States of America North Republic, calling into international law the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and Morocco 1786/1787 while petitioning for a correction of their legal status, noting the fact that they were not “black” and that they were to be treated fairly as other national citizens are. As the Massachusetts’ district and superior courts are well aware of, Moorish Americans are foreign Nationals who are A-1 Freeholders and not 14th Amendment united states citizens or subjects, nor chattel property or wards of any state.

 

Thus, the status of this issue arises where the UNDRIP recognizes per articles 3, 4, and 6 further affirmed by article III section II of the Constitution for the United States of America North Republic to include the named federal ingredients. Inter / National Subject matter in question pertaining the federal ingredient include:

​

​

​

Jurisdiction.

​

“When a Judge acts where he or she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason.” US v Will,449 US 200,216, 101 S Ct, 471, 66 Led2nd 392, 406 (1980) Cohens v Virginia, 19 US (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 Led 257 (1821). Magistrates EMILY K. KARSTETTER, PETER F. DOYLE, JAMES L. LaMONTHE, and LAURENCE PIERCE are all in excess of jurisdiction constitutionally and in accordance with their own Massachusetts General Law statutes, deeming all proceedings void ab initio (from the beginning). Nonetheless, the courts decide to perpetuate fraud with malice per MGL statute 276 subsection 58A which conflicts with constitutional guarantees by violating the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms, 5th Amendment rights of due process, 6th amendment rights to a speedy trial, & the 8th amendment by infliction of cruel & unusual punishment and /or excessive fines. Article I Section VIII of the Constitution states that “the Congress shall have the power to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court; to define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas and offenses against the law of nations.” Seeing as the lower courts are not defending the law of nations with the powers vested in them and since this matter regards the law of the land of which Moors are part and parcel, lower COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et. ALIA courts ignoring the Article III question while continuing their colorable procedure is against the natural Law, against the Law of nations & treaties, denationalization, & treason.

​

​

​

Venue.

​

Had there been an injured party and / or Corpus Delecti to claim a criminal offense having ensued, then perhaps one would be well within reason to pursue Article 21 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and Morocco 1786/1787;1836 maintaining that equal justice be rendered should a citizen of the united states kill or wound a Moor and vice versa. However, this is not the case where no party of theirs has been wounded or killed, nor a Corpus Delecti nor crime exists. If there were an injured party, the Moors are entitled to face said accuser and to be informed the nature of the accusations to prepare a proper defense. According to the 6th amendment and the Rule of Discovery, they all have the right to see the sworn affidavit of the alleged injured party. Instead, Article 20 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and Morocco 1786/1787;1836 confirms that the venue is consular / federal court supported by Article III Section II of the Constitution for the United States of America North Republic. (see: Title 22 USC Ch.2 subsection 141-143). 

​

​

​

Adjudication.

​

With the status of the matter at hand, it is clear that the proper venue for adjudication would be either consular or federal court pursuant to the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between the United States and Morocco 1786/1787;1836 and confirmed by Article III of the Constitution for the United States of America North Republic. Per the unratified 14th Amendment, denationalization and the deprivation of the natural rights of an Aborigine via color of law adjudication is a crime against humanity, genocidal and unconstitutional. Furthermore, it is STILL a problem that there are people - Moorish American and/or other; being unlawfully held in the jails at Massachusetts under their unconstitutional statutes and for no true crime at all.