*What is the 58a Statute?*
About the MASSACHUSETTS statute the prosecution attempts to charge the Moors with.
General Laws are for the average person to inform themselves of the Local rules and regulations of each state. The 58a statute they are utilizing to keep the Moors captive and/ or released under threat, duress & coercion starts with Massachusetts General Laws Ch. 269 Subsection 10 regards Possession of a large capacity firearm and possession of a large capacity feeding device and unlawful possession of a weapon, where it states that “The commonwealth must prove that the person knew that he was in possession of a firearm in a conventional sense of the term” (see: Commonwealth vs. Sampson; Commonwealth vs Morrero), but they also apply to the term “weapon” that the legislation only looks at whether or not the person knew the definition of the term on all legislations and all statutes that are passed / amended. Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 140 subsection 121 defines a firearm as "a weapon from which a shot or bullet can be discharged and of which the length of the barrel or barrels is less than 16 inches". However, in General Laws Ch 269 subsection 10 sect 1 No 7 states that " a shot gun is a firearm if it’s 18 inches". Therefore, the statements between statutes are ambiguous and conflict, and there is no clear comprehension to the reader of the difference between a "firearm" or "weapon". . There is another statute where a machine gun is said to be created to injure or to kill and is placed in the definition of a “weapon” in the statutes, where machine guns and weapons are fused together, meddling and tampering with the language to confuse. In order for a firearm to be dangerous, the wielder would have to have evil intent FIRST, as a weapon is anything used against an enemy, which prosecution would have to prove. In this case, where is the enemy to support the alleged charges?
EVIL. adj. e'vl. [Heb. to be unjust or injurious, to defraud.] + INTENT. noun Literally, the stretching of the mind towards an object; hence, a design; a purpose; intention; meaning; drift; aim; applied to persons or things. (Webster's American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828)
All of the laws boil down to the sense of the term, one’s intent, and if one knew. It then becomes clear that the court is committing fraud with criminal intent in attempts to put people under oath and to coerce them using a word or phrase that will incriminate them in what they are being allegedly charged with, proceeding with evil intent to execute an evil deed (see: Masters vs. United States).
*Laws -vs- Codes & Statutes*
The 58a statute seems part of a legislative scheme devised to detain innocent people with semantics.
Conventional definitions utilized for COMMON LAW:
LEGISLATIVE. Making or having the power to make a law or laws + SCHEME. A design or plan formed to accomplish some purpose—a system. (Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.'n)
ARM. Anything that a man wears for his defense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at or strike at another. (Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.'n)
FIREARM. An instrument used in the propulsion of shot, shell, or bullets by the action of gunpowder exploded within it. A weapon which acts by force of gunpowder. (Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.'n)
WEAPON. An instrument of offensive or defensive combat, or anything used, or designed to be used, in destroying, defeating or injuring an enemy.
Massachusetts STATUTORY definition:
“Firearm”. a stun gun or a pistol, revolver or other weapon of any description, loaded or unloaded, from which a shot or bullet can be discharged and of which the length of the barrel or barrels is less than 16 inches or 18 inches in the case of a shotgun as originally manufactured; provided, however, that the term firearm shall not include any weapon that is: (i) constructed in a shape that does not resemble a handgun, short-barreled rifle or short-barreled shotgun including, but not limited to, covert weapons that resemble key-chains, pens, cigarette-lighters or cigarette-packages; or (ii) not detectable as a weapon or potential weapon by x-ray machines commonly used at airports or walk- through metal detectors. (Mass. General Laws c. 140 subsection 121: Firearms sales; definitions; antique firearms; application of law; exceptions)
"Weapon". Any rifle, shotgun, or firearm. (Mass. General Laws c. 140 subsection 121: Firearms sales; definitions; antique firearms; application of law; exceptions)
Where did the Moorish militia's 2nd amendment rights go when armed state officers aimed their "weapons" with intent to shoot the Moors? If one is traveling with arms intending to go safety training with it, but another traveler is traveling with a rope whose plan is to go and hang someone with it, then is the firearm considered the weapon, or is the rope???
~The Constitution for the United States of America, North Republic~
" A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed". - 2nd Amendment.
58a State Violations.
The 58a statute should never have applied in this case and whether the commonwealth offers conditions upon release at anytime, especially those relating to their definition of "firearms" still makes the order void.
EMILY K. KARSTETTER was in excess of her jurisdiction as non-compliant with her own state's 58a statute, never having provided any written explanation for holding them captive which is required by the statute. She also refuses to answer the Article III question regarding lack of jurisdiction over the matter that has been inquired of her several times. The order was void then and still proceeded to superior court which is void as well.
58a National Violations.
58a violates not only the 2nd amendment right to bear arms, but also due process rights of innocent presumption, and 5th amendment rights against double jeopardy for hosting multiple hearings regarding the same thing repeatedly. 58a violates the 6th amendment rights to a speedy trial, utilized to detain the Moors past 120 days, 180 days, and counting, breeching the Speedy Trial Act of 1974 for a trial to commence within 70 days.
With their attempts to use COVID-19 circumstances as an excuse for prolonged detainment, it is still not the source of the issue. The source of the issue is the statute 276 subsection 58a because it was in force prior to any COVID-19 pandemic stipulations. The statute violates the 8th amendment by enforcing excessive fines / cruel & unusual punishment as the only state with the statute, which was not in common use at the time of the amendments the U.S. Constitution were enacted.
58a International Violations.
Click here for international violations.
$$$ Mass Incarceration & the Million Dollar Question $$$
How many people of all nationalities & creeds, because of the complexion of their skin or their defense of inalienable rights may be rotting in jails & prisons across Massachusetts because of the unconstitutional 58A statute?
What is Human Trafficking & how does the 58a statute contribute?
COLOR OF LAW. The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right.
The United Nations definition of Human Trafficking is the recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt of people through force, fraud or deception, with the aim of exploiting them for profit. Abuse of the color of law fuels slavery - based economies through paper transactions backed by Human collateral. This collateral is obliviously part of a color-based caste system, classed as "dead in the eyes of the law". When public officers apply colorable codes and statutes to the "colored" unlawfully, any "charges" must either be paid with time, labor, or federal reserve note (USD) by the arrestee / prisoner. When paid with time, prison systems and their investors get paid off of inmate maintenance in a variety of ways. The unlawful imprisonment of innocent people when actual criminals run amuck is no accident. Slavery never ended, it is simply called by another name and executed with re-phrased strategies. Although the history of the black experience includes the great achievements of copper-toned People / Moors whose ancestral origins derive from this very landmass, it also includes harrowing atrocities of prejudice against them, whose de-nationalization by color-of-law perpetuates unnecessary abuses justified by one's "black", "negro", or "colored" status as a "beast of no nation", so to speak. The irony is that the color-of-law was originally established for non-original peoples to be able to commercially interact with aborigines of the land, since those people (i.e. Slavs of Slovakia / enslaved populations trafficked from other land Masses) had no blood ties to the land. Somehow, (through losing/abandoning knowledge of self, it seems) the copper-toned, allodial populations were stripped of their cultures, forcefully miseducated, and fraudulently sold back to them their own entitlements.
How the prison system collects off of the prison industrial complex
The tax dollars of the very same people trafficked through these systems are used to remedy damages from injuries that the system inflicts upon them, perpetuating a cycle of systemic oppression that disproportionately affects copper-toned people / Moors, even though those classed as "black", "negroes" & "coloreds" are living, breathing, sentient Beings in real life and not Crayon colors or objects.
What Does This Have To Do With Rise of The Moors?
The amount of fiat the commonwealth is likely making off of the high profile spectacle they've created is probably by the boatloads, especially if they can force jurisdiction where no crime exists even though the Men are innocent and have Nationality. The prison network extorts social security accounts with homonyms similar to the ex-relationes and/or misnomers which these Moors have been fraudulently imprisoned by, whose bodies are held as collateral placeholders for exploitative purposes.
* Why MOORS Charge Genocide *
GENOCIDE. “A brutal crime that is not an isolated incident but that involves large and systematic actions, often cloaked with official authority, and that shocks the conscience of humankind. Among the specific crimes that fall within this category are mass murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts perpetrated against a population, whether in wartime or not and is in fact Genocide”. – Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Article 7: Crimes Against Humanity.
~ Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 13 §241 of United States Codes of Law ~
“If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, commonwealth, Possession, or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or Laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or… If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with the intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured - They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, oran attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”
The MASSACHUSETTS COMMONWEALTH and its cohorts can be proven as having violated Natural, International, Treaty & Constitutional Law, ignorance of U.S. Supreme Court decisions and even their OWN laws, their activity results in acts of Genocide. The entire ordeal staged by the MASSACHUSETTS COMMONWEALTH has caused emotional distress and highly adverse effects for Moorish Americans generally. Several specific offenses against the Moors currently held captive include (but are not limited to):
Conspiracy; proceedings in excess of jurisdiction; Mail tampering & interception; commissary theft of care package items like stamps and envelopes; microphone tampering during Zoom hearings; court fraud; withholding evidence and evidence tampering; deprived due process rights; dietary insults; denial of Library access with intent to prevent My opportunity to prepare a proper defense; denial of Viziers of their choosing; denial of notary public services without agreeance to perjury; derogatory epithets; mental manipulation and abuse; stolen property; restriction from important consular phone calls at whim without reason; exposure to illicit drugs at the jailhouses, and rape at the hands of an officer with witness accounts to attest.
Fraudulent court proceedings under the color-of-law continuously deprive the inalienable rights of living, breathing, & sentient Beings. The MASSACHUSETTS COMMONWEALTH, et. ALIA, its cohorts, and said Media outlets have altered hours - long footage in favor of a narrative that conspires to keep Moorish Americans deprived of their freeedoms. By keeping their biased media published (although much damage has already been done), various outlets attempting to categorize Moorish Americans as “anti-government” “sovereign citizens” of which they are not makes said outlets responsible parties to genocide pursuant to the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
The damage done to the reputation of Moorish Americans per the slanderous misinformation which the media has distributed in an organized effort involve stereotypes and systemic prejudice utilizing specific labels to impress upon the public an act of terrorism having transpired. Where there is recorded footage of the Moors affirming with the DANVERS STATE POLICE that day that they are absolutely not “black identity extremists”, “sovereign citizens”, “anti-government”, and / or “terrorists” without question, the resources between the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et. ALIA and media are powerful enough to sway the public opinion, ultimately impacting fair proceedings and threatening many lives.
The state of Massachusetts is the ONLY state with the unconstitutional, over-used & abused 58a statute
The media has even gone so far as to redirect organic internet leads of Rise of the Moors’ online estate toward their own platforms via Rise of the Moors meta/tags to further inflate misleading information and defame any positive Rise of the Moors content after YouTube’s confiscation of their intellectual property following the July 3rd event. Their defamation-of- character, slander, and attempts to discriminate and conspire against national origin directly affect the credibility, reputation, and well-being of many families, their offspring, the nation and our quality of living by suppressing our opportunities in pursuit of happiness.
Between VAN EPPS, the MASSACHUSETTS court and jail systems, conspired efforts to keep the Moors from accessing raw UNREDACTED footage of the July 3rd event (which the prosecution alleges charges against them based only upon PORTIONS of ), have hindered the Moors' ability to prepare a proper defense against a victimless "crime", because the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and its cohorts know that if the full eight-hour footage of actual events and ALL the body came footage of the officers are keenly reviewed (even though the officers muted their body cams at integral moments of the interaction), that their schemes will be exposed. It is criminal and deceitful to deprive what is rightfully owed to the people for their general review. For those Moors on temporary release until a try-al, they are being required not to contact the others of whom prosecutor VAN EPPS alleges are a "joint venture". How can the eleven of them defend their position when the courts demand they not speak? Conspiracy to weaken their defense is unlawful.
To date, Jamhal Talib Abdullah Bey, Lucha El Por Libertad, Aban El Curragh & Jamil Rasul Bey are continuing to stand on faith that the Truth will prevail and that the People will recognize the threat to their inalienable rights by those "beings" and "powers-that-be" who abuse their power.
Brandon Britton,Wilfredo Hernandez, Robert Rodriguez, and Aaron Johnson have all taken plea deals. An unwarranted "warrant" was issued for 'Lamar Dow' for the inability to provide a physical address.